With
Hurricane Sandy something of the past now, it is brought to our attention that
our technological advancement here in the U.S. is far behind that of other
countries. Well over a week prior to Sandy made landfall in the Northeast, some
of the weather computer models were predicting “Sandy” (unnamed at the time) to
be an unusual, yet very strong storm to the very region it hit. Some of the
other computer models predicted that the storm would develop, but would head
out to the Atlantic and spare the U.S. entirely. While all of the models ended
up with the same consensus, including the National Hurricane Center (NHC) 4
days before it hit the New Jersey/New York, was that enough time for all
residents, businesses, and governments to prepare? It also limits the time to
rush supplies to that area that they will need once the storm hits.
While the actual weather computer
models themselves were invented here in the U.S., the level of accuracy and
ability of those models have fallen substantially behind those of other
nations’ models. In fact, Kerry Emanuel, a writer for the Wall Street Journal,
believes we may actually be in third or even fourth place compared to other
nations. So who is the leader of the pack? What is commonly referred to as the
Euro Model, is definitely at the top. In fact, this year alone, the Euro
correctly predicted the tracks of both Hurricane Isaac and Sandy well before
the other models did. This is important since these were the two big storms
that actually hit the U.S. The
Washington Post noted that the NHC’s parent company, NOAA had mentioned the
European model’s scenario on its website, saying that if it proved true, it
would create “a powerhouse capable of whipping the Atlantic into a frenzy and
churning up dangerous tides.” However, it did not go as far as to agree with
the model, just to say that basically “this is what the Euro model is
predicting”.
“[The U.S. has] tremendous weather
forecasting capacity, but we’re still losing to the Europeans,” said Heidi
Cullen, chief climatologist at Climate Central, a nonprofit that communicates
science to the public.
Why is the Euro so much better than
the others? Well, for starters, the Euro model tends to focus more on numerical
weather prediction and run their models on larger and faster computers.
In fact, Judith Curry, chairwoman of
the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, said about the Euro, “[It’s] better
overall”. She also went on to say that
the model has a higher resolution than its U.S. equivalent, makes more frequent
forecasts, and is better at assimilating satellite data.
However, one area where we excel
over them is that we recognize that this information is a public good, and since
it is funded largely by the taxpayer, it should be available free of charge to
the public. Why is that so important? Well, ironically, some European businesses
prefer to use U.S. forecast models because they are free, whereas some U.S.
businesses will actually spend very large amounts of money for European
forecasts because they are better. So if only we could provide the same
accuracy that the Euro does, and free like we currently do, we certainly would
get back on top again.
Marshall Shepherd, director of the
atmospheric sciences program at the University of Georgia, blames lack of
funding for many of the problems facing NOAA. “That only gets worse going
forward as we talk about sequestration and cutting agencies’ budgets,” he said.
But is more money necessarily the
solution to fixing this problem? What if the real solution lies with
restructuring the current NOAA system. Why not do like the European model does,
and instead of only having one country’s model be the end all be all, use
multiple countries to provide that model data? Conceivably we could have Canada
and Mexico join in with us, providing us with a larger blend of government,
media, academic, and private sector talent. Perhaps then could we get back on
top again, and not have to rely so much on other computer models, simply
because they are better than ours.
Sources:
Speakeasy, Wall Street Journal, Politico, NOAA, Spaghettimodels.com, Wright
Weather, ABC, NY Daily News,
